While the Greeks may have believed that in order to be a good orator one has to be morally good, I personally disagree. One’s ability to speak clearly, to be persuasive, and convey a poignant message does not need a foundation of morality. While having a pre-established foundation of being a moral character lends to being viewed as an authoritative figure, which helps with the persuasion, it is not by any means a requirement. However, I would agree that one should be of a morally good character to be a good speaker. I dislike the idea that one can give a very provocative and persuasive speech, and yet at the same time be lying through their teeth. This goes against why I believe people should give speeches. I believe people should give speeches to convey understanding and meaning. To do otherwise, or to give a speech from a morally questionable position, not only makes the individual’s goals suspect, but also their character, and taints whatever message they were trying to convey.
I support your opinion on this subject. It is disappointing to watch some speakers especially some politician’s take advantage of their authority and convey messages that are destructive. I like how you pointed out, that when you know or suspect the speakers immorality, you automatically suspect and question everything they say. The unfortunate side is that not every recipient is advised of that fact, which results in dramatic aftereffects. In my opinion it is easy to brain wash the recipients who normally do not have their own opinion, or are not familiar with the subject. In sad cases, some recipients become followers of these immoral public speakers.
ReplyDelete